>   I’m so happy to hear about these new groups.  I’ve been living
>in a DOS nighmare for about 10 years now, and now I find out that
>I can chuck it all and go to MS-Windows.  

Good god, man, where’ve you been?  9-)

All the rest of the readers here are migrants from comp.windows.ms..
no need at all to wait for these new groups…

>I call for an immediate change of these groups to be consistent
>with network naming convention to be called:
>        comp.os.msdos.ms-windows.<whatever>
>or (because I feel deep within my heart that Bill Gates would
>want it so):
>        comp.os.msdos.env.ms-windows.<whatever>
>or perhaps, even better:
>        comp.os.msdos.we’ll.call.it.whatever.we.want.so.that.people. >
>will.believe.that.windows.does.more.than.just.sit.on.top.of.dos.and. >
>look.pretty

A little too late for that now. If you were aware of comp.windows.ms you
would doubtlessly read the charter, gotten involved in the discussion,
voted against the hierarchy, and lost.

–
——————————————————————————-
Iskandar Taib                          | The only thing worse than Peach ala
Internet: NT…@SILVER.UCS.INDIANA.EDU |    Frog is Frog ala Peach
Bitnet:   NTAIB@IUBACS                 !
——————————————————————————-

>   I’m so happy to hear about these new groups.  I’ve been living
>in a DOS nighmare for about 10 years now, and now I find out that
>I can chuck it all and go to MS-Windows.  I can’t tell you how happy
>I am to know that DOS, with all its limitations and antiquated

Not that I hate DOS (I don’t have a problem using it for years
and it serves my needs), but I’m really interested in
running windows without a DOS.

Could you please tell us what EXACTLY you did in those 14 hours
before you managed to run Windows without DOS.

Thanks for any advice you might give us.